You snap to attention when you spot her, too, not because she has His Goofy Radiance but because she’s such an improbable survivor — from Hillarycare to everywhere, a secretary of state as frequent-flying and industrious as any — and because after all these years, she remains an erratically coifed enigma, the conventional interpretation of any one chapter of her life not sufficing for the next. First she got so far and presumptuously ahead of herself, an upstart. Then she patiently did the work and recreated herself, a penitent. When she set her sights on the Oval Office, she seemed as intent as anybody had ever been. When she didn’t get there, she let go of the dream with uncommon grace.
The above unnamed couple that the NY Times Reporter is talking about are Hillary and Bill Clinton.
With that said, who in their right thinking mind gives somebody a backhanded compliment, (kissing somebody on one cheek and slapping them on the other you can choose what cheeks I mean by that) by putting these two words together GOOFY and RADIANCE?
There is no GOOFY RADIANCE? Hillary Clinton is not a Forrest Gump-like lovable retard. Bill Clinton is not a Forrest Gump lovable retard.
When I saw these two words being reported on C-Span by Steve Scully as he read this article out loud this morning it got in craw and I had to do something to defend Hill 'n Bill. So writing it out is my way.
There is no such thing as Goofy Radiance when you're talking about more successful people than Forrest Gump like Hill 'n Bill.
Forrest Gump talked with a twang and was from the South That's where the GOOFY similarities ends in regards to Hill 'n Bill.
So There Mr NY Times Reporter who I refuse to give a name in this blog, because you sir, are a Nobody writing about Somebodies who's Half of their combined radiance you Wished you possessed.